Legal Opinion

Dolph v. Mangus

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1980No. 3-477A95PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiffs brought this action for damages and injunction claiming that the defendants had altered the natural flow of surface waters causing flooding and erosion of some of plaintiffs' cropland. The defendants answered in denial, and also asserted the statute of limitations. After trial the court entered certain findings sua sponte and gave judgment for the defendants. 1

The complaint asserted that there were two distinct natural drainage systems affecting plaintiffs' land and that each had been affected by acts of one or more of the defendants. These systems have…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Brown v. HeidersbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Smart & Perry Ford Sales, Inc. v. WeaverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Kizer v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Henderson v. TalbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Robert L. Kroenlein Trust ex rel. Alden v. KirchheferWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Stickdorn v. ZookIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. American Fletcher National Bank & Trust Co. v. Pavilion, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Powell v. DawsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API