Van Patten v. City of Binghamton
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION & ORDER
McAVOY, District Judge.
Plaintiff James Van Patten commenced the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights arising out of Defendants’ euthanizing his dog. Presently before the Court are: (1) Defendant Bugonian’s motion for abstention and/or partial summary judgment; (2) Defendant City of Binghamton and Jensen’s motion for abstention; and (3) Plaintiffs cross-motion for partial summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff was the owner of a mixed breed dog named Shadow. 1 On or about May 30, 2000,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frederique v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Snead v. Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Schor v. NORTH BRADDOCK BOROUGHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Martinez v. RobledoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- DORSETT-FELICELLI, INC. v. County of ClintonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.