Legal Opinion

Van Patten v. City of Binghamton

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided April 18, 2001No. 3:00-cv-01104PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM — DECISION & ORDER

McAVOY, District Judge.

Plaintiff James Van Patten commenced the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights arising out of Defendants’ euthanizing his dog. Presently before the Court are: (1) Defendant Bugonian’s motion for abstention and/or partial summary judgment; (2) Defendant City of Binghamton and Jensen’s motion for abstention; and (3) Plaintiffs cross-motion for partial summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff was the owner of a mixed breed dog named Shadow. 1 On or about May 30, 2000,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frederique v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  2. Snead v. Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Schor v. NORTH BRADDOCK BOROUGHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Martinez v. RobledoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. DORSETT-FELICELLI, INC. v. County of ClintonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API