Legal Opinion

Snead v. Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 2007PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.:

¶ 1 This matter involves cross-appeals following a jury trial in which defendant, Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Pennsylvania (“SPCA”), was found hable for euthanizing the dogs belonging to plaintiff, Laila Snead (“Snead”). The jury awarded Snead $154,926.37, including $100,000 in punitive damages. We affirm the judgment in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2 The procedural history of this case is somewhat complicated and the facts involving the condition of the dogs at the heart of this case are very disturbing.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kohl v. New Sewickley Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Straw, J. v. Fair, K. v. Pittsburgh LubesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Weston v. Northampton Personal Care, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Dubose, R. v. Quinlan, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Snead v. Society for Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API