Legal Opinion

Riley v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided December 12, 1995No. 1490942PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANNUNZIATA Judge.

Following a jury trial, the appellant, Charles Richard Riley, was convicted of abduction, five counts of rape, and two counts of sodomy. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in the following: (1) sustaining the Commonwealth’s peremptory challenges even though based on the gender of the stricken jurors; (2) ruling that the Commonwealth’s peremptory challenges based on age were proper; and (3) bifurcating the trial and sentencing proceedings pursuant to Code § 19.2-295.1. We find that the Commonwealth’s peremptory strikes were gender-based and, therefore, improper.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Smith v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lebedun v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  2. Akins v. EasterlingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. Coleman v. HoganSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  4. Cudjoe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  5. People v. Douglas, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API