People v. Douglas
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtDuarte, J.
*307*1164This case is about fairness and equality in our criminal justice system. When a party exercises a peremptory challenge against a prospective *1165juror for an invidious reason, the fact that the party may also have had one or more legitimate reasons for challenging that juror does not eliminate the taint to the process. We reject the application in these circumstances of the so-called "mixed motive" or "dual motive" analysis, which arose in employment discrimination cases as a way for defendant-employers to show that they would have taken an adverse action against a plaintiff-employee whether…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hart v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- People v. SilasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021