Grummel v. Hollenstein
Arizona Supreme Court
1Per curiam
From a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, both the plaintiffs and defendants appeal. The matter was tried by the court without a jury. The parties will be referred to as they appear in the trial court.
The essential facts are as follows: Defendants owned 640 acres of unimproved land in the Harquahala Valley in central Arizona. In addition, they held desert entry rights to an additional 480 acres of unimproved Federal land adjoining their fee acreage.
In the latter part of 1951 plaintiffs and defendants entered into an oral agreement whereby the plaintiffs agreed to sink an irrigation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jacob v. MinerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Caveny v. ASHEIMOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- MacKey v. SpanglerArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Engasser v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Cole v. AtkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Gilmore v. CohenArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc. v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Geist v. LehmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.