Legal Opinion

State v. Griffith

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 20, 2007No. 24389-3-IIIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

151 P.3d 230 (2007)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Joan Marie GRIFFITH, Appellant.

No. 24389-3-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

January 30, 2007.

As Corrected February 20, 2007.

William D. Edelblute, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

George William Gagnon, III, Kevin Michael Korsmo, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, C.J.

¶ 1 The decision whether and in what amounts to impose restitution as part of a sentence is discretionary with the sentencing court, so long as the restitution imposed is related to the defendant's crime. The defendant here challenges the factual basis for the court's…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. VickersWashington Supreme Court · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API