Legal Opinion

Brown v. Fore

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 5, 1927No. 10079. [fn*]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, C. J.

In a suit in the district court of Hunt county, appellee Mrs. Etta Fore was decreed to be the owner of certain vendor lien notes executed by appellee Virgil Husbands, and was awarded judgment for the amount of the notes and a foreclosure of the vendor’s lien on two tracts of land in Hunt County. From this judgment, the executors of the will of F. M. Fore, deceased, have duly perfected their appeal.

In the trial below, the only contested issue was as to the ownership of the indebtedness represented by the two series of notes. Husbands did not contest the amount of the indebtedness alleged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oury v. SaundersTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Beazley v. DensonTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. McCamly v. WaterhouseTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. BremondTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. ForeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Aaron v. AaronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API