Legal Opinion

Native Angels Home Care Agency, Inc. v. Sebelius

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided October 29, 2010No. 7:09-cv-00187PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES C. DEVER III, District Judge.

Native Angels Home Care Agency, Inc. (“Native Angels” or “plaintiff’), a Medicare-certified hospice provider, filed suit against Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Hu man Services (“Secretary” or “defendant”) and contends that 42 C.F.R. § 418.309(b)(1) is invalid and contrary to law. For purposes of calculating a hospice provider’s Medicare-reimbursement “cap” for a fiscal year, 42 C.F.R. § 418.309(b)(1) dictates how to determine the number of Medicare beneficiaries that a hospice provider has serviced in that fiscal year.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southeast Arkansas Hospice, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2014
  2. ZIA HOSPICE, INC. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
  3. Planned Parenthood of Maryland, Inc. v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API