Native Angels Home Care Agency, Inc. v. Sebelius
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER III, District Judge.
Native Angels Home Care Agency, Inc. (“Native Angels” or “plaintiff’), a Medicare-certified hospice provider, filed suit against Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Hu man Services (“Secretary” or “defendant”) and contends that 42 C.F.R. § 418.309(b)(1) is invalid and contrary to law. For purposes of calculating a hospice provider’s Medicare-reimbursement “cap” for a fiscal year, 42 C.F.R. § 418.309(b)(1) dictates how to determine the number of Medicare beneficiaries that a hospice provider has serviced in that fiscal year.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southeast Arkansas Hospice, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2014
- ZIA HOSPICE, INC. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Planned Parenthood of Maryland, Inc. v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020