Norris v. Goodcell
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, District Judge.
This action is brought to recover the principal sum of $15,-874.12, alleged to have been paid under protest to the defendant collector as-an estate tax owing to the government. The tax was paid by Lucy Banning Ross, as executrix of the estate of Mary Hollister Banning, deceased. An additional charge amounting to $2,408.69, as interest, was collected on the same account' and the prayer of the complaint includes a demand for the repayment of that sum also. The real interest affected was that of Mary Banning Norris.
The tax charges were made on account of an alleged one-half…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barton v. Automobile Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
- Gardner v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1932
- Smith v. Coupang IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024