Legal Opinion

Norris v. Goodcell

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 15, 1927No. 2025PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, District Judge.

This action is brought to recover the principal sum of $15,-874.12, alleged to have been paid under protest to the defendant collector as-an estate tax owing to the government. The tax was paid by Lucy Banning Ross, as executrix of the estate of Mary Hollister Banning, deceased. An additional charge amounting to $2,408.69, as interest, was collected on the same account' and the prayer of the complaint includes a demand for the repayment of that sum also. The real interest affected was that of Mary Banning Norris.

The tax charges were made on account of an alleged one-half…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barton v. Automobile Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
  2. Gardner v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1932
  3. Smith v. Coupang IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API