Legal Opinion
Smith v. Coupang Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 11, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01887Unknown
1Opinion
1 HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 10 AT SEATTLE 11 PHILIP SMITH, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-01887-RAJ 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 COUPANG INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a 21 Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”)1 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. 22 Dkt. # 35. Defendant opposes Plaintiff’s Motion. Dkt. # 42. For the reasons set forth 23 below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion. Dkt. # 35. 24 25 1 Plaintiff’s briefing refers to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Frank Rose Clive "Sonny" Miller, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.