Legal Opinion

Gardner v. United States

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided June 20, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RITTER, District Judge.

This action is brought by the plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Mary A. Gardner, deceased, for a refund of estate taxes and interest thereon paid to the United States by the estate of Mary A. Gardner. $118.90 of the amount claimed has been abandoned, by reason of its being barred by time.

The pleadings admit the payment of the tax and interest, and the dates of the same. It is also admitted that the net value of the property in question is $141,364.48. The plaintiff contends that the said property, of the said value, was held under a trust created by an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Shwab v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
  3. Rea v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Smart v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1927
  5. Norris v. GoodcellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
  2. Chester Bulkoski v. Bacharach, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API