Mercantile & General Reinsurance Co. v. Colonial Assurance Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Baer, Jr., J.
In this decision of one of a series of motions in limine, a *805brief recitation of the facts is essential. The relief sought by the plaintiff herein, Mercantile & General Reinsurance Co. (M&G), is a declaratory judgment that M&G is not bound to provide reinsurance to defendant Colonial Insurance Co. with respect to insurance policies issued by Colonial to the defendant Spanno Corporation (Spanno). M&G also seeks rescission and other forms of relief. Spanno was in the business of appraising aircraft or other property and guaranteeing that the property could…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vavolizza v. KriegerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Jeppesen & Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1977
- Angstrohm Precision, Inc. v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Mansfield State Bank v. CohnNew York Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by5 opinions
- Campbell v. SZL Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Ruben v. American & Foreign InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Allstate Insurance v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Siegel v. Time Warner Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Shirley P. v. Norman P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018