Legal Opinion

Mercantile & General Reinsurance Co. v. Colonial Assurance Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold Baer, Jr., J.

In this decision of one of a series of motions in limine, a *805brief recitation of the facts is essential. The relief sought by the plaintiff herein, Mercantile & General Reinsurance Co. (M&G), is a declaratory judgment that M&G is not bound to provide reinsurance to defendant Colonial Insurance Co. with respect to insurance policies issued by Colonial to the defendant Spanno Corporation (Spanno). M&G also seeks rescission and other forms of relief. Spanno was in the business of appraising aircraft or other property and guaranteeing that the property could…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vavolizza v. KriegerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Jeppesen & Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1977
  4. Angstrohm Precision, Inc. v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
  5. Mansfield State Bank v. CohnNew York Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. SZL Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. Ruben v. American & Foreign InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Allstate Insurance v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Siegel v. Time Warner Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
  5. Shirley P. v. Norman P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API