Legal Opinion
Whitehead v. CAPITAL AUTOMOBILE COMPANY
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 7, 1977No. 32221PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, Justice.
The appellant sued an automobile dealer for specific performance of an alleged contract for the purchase of a new (soon to be discontinued) Cadillac convertible. The dealer’s motion for summary judgment was granted by the trial court. The appellant purchaser contends that the dealer did not show that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact as is required by Code Ann. § 81A-156 (c).
On motion for summary judgment the dealer filed an affidavit of its sales manager stating that neither he nor any other "authorized” person "accepted any offer” made by plaintiff to purchase…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burnette Ford, Inc. v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Cochran v. MurrahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Ham v. HamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Dickson v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jones v. RodzewiczCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Whirlpool Corp. v. HurlbutCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Northside Equities, Inc. v. HulseySupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Hill v. Six Flags Over Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Guest v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.