Legal Opinion

Northside Equities, Inc. v. Hulsey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 2002No. S01G1307PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Justice.

The issue in this Dram Shop Act case is whether the plaintiff produced sufficient evidence to avoid the award of summary judgment to the defendant. The trial court ruled that the plaintiff had not sufficiently countered the evidence offered by the defendant in support of its motion for summary judgment, but the Court of Appeals reversed. Hulsey v. Northside Equities, 249 Ga. App. 474 (2) (548 SE2d 41) (2001). This Court granted certiorari to consider whether scientific evidence of a driver’s blood alcohol level, adduced in opposition to direct eyewitness testimony that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burnette Ford, Inc. v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Birnbrey, Minsk & Minsk, LLC v. YirgaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. McElroy v. CodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Whitehead v. CAPITAL AUTOMOBILE COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Hulsey v. Northside Equities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Layfield v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. Becks v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Wright v. Pine Hills Country Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Willbanks v. SUGARLOAF CAFE, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Townsend v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API