Whirlpool Corp. v. Hurlbut
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Shulman, Chief Judge.
We granted these interlocutory appeals to review the trial court’s denial of the motions for summary judgment of appellants Seay and Whirlpool. Both appeals have been consolidated in this court.
This action was brought by appellee to recover for injuries he *96allegedly sustained as the result of an explosion that occurred in the kitchen of Seay’s condominium. Seay, a secretary/homeowner, employed appellee to install tile on her kitchen floor. The existing floor covering consisted of an indoor/outdoor carpet, which had to be removed prior to installation of the tile.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Center Chemical Co. v. ParziniSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Hunt v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Amear v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Greenway v. Peabody International Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Union Carbide Corp. v. HoltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Coast Catamaran Corp. v. MannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Continental Research Corp. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Ream Tool Co. v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- McFadden Business Publications, Inc. v. GuidryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Splish Splash Waterslides, Inc. v. Cherokee InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.