Legal Opinion
Krichbaum v. United States Forest Service
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided July 3, 1997No. Civil Action 96-1000-RPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILSON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Steven Krichbaum seeks judicial review, pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, of an administrative decision by the defendants, the United States Forest Service, Regional Forester Robert Joslin, and Forest Supervisor William Damon (hereinafter referred to collectively as “the Forest Service”). Krichbaum alleges that the decision to pro ceed with the Hematite Timber Sale of 187 acres in the 1.1 million acres of the George Washington National Forest (hereinafter “the Forest”) violates the National Environmental…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Piedmont Environmental Council v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
- North Carolina Alliance for Transportation Reform, Inc. v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
- Shenandoah Ecosystems Defense Group v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
- Chattooga Conservancy v. JacobsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
- Krichbaum v. U.S. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.