Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Cecil

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided August 2, 2024No. 1:21-cv-00091Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No.: 1:21-cv-91-KAC-SKL ) JONATHAN CECIL, JEREMY KENNEDY, ) and KOLLIN KENNEDY, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT This case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Amended Motion for Summary Judgment” [Doc. 24]. Because Defendant Jonathan Cecil did not have Defendant Jeremy Kennedy’s consent to use the vehicle he was driving when he got into a car accident, Defendant Cecil is not an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API