Legal Opinion
Ana Maria Lanza v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 22, 2004No. 02-73538PublishedCited by 247 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*919SILVER, District Judge.
Petitioner Ana Maria Lanza (“Lanza”), a native of Argentina, seeks review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the “BIA” or the “Board”) denying her petitions for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (“CAT”). An Immigration Judge (“IJ”) found that Lanza’s asylum application was untimely and that Lanza did not establish extraordinary circumstances to excuse that untimeliness. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B), (D) (2000). As an alternative…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by247 opinions
- Perez v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Gourgen Movsisian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Ming Shi Xue v. Board of Immigration Appeals, U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Rafael Guerrero-Sanchez v. Warden York County PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Jose J. Padilla-Padilla Guadalupe D. Padilla-Enriquez Adela Enriquez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.