Legal Opinion

United States v. Joe Benally

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 7, 2016No. 14-10452PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed on August 1, 2016 is amended as follows:

Replace the portion of the opinion that runs from the second paragraph of page 9 of the slip opinion (beginning <Leocal explicitly leaves open the question whether ... >) through the end of the penultimate paragraph on page 10 (which ends < ... and is no longer good law.>) with:

<After Leocal, we held that “neither recklessness nor gross negligence is a sufficient mens rea to establish that a convi,ction is for a crime of violence under § 16.” Femandez-Ruiz, 466 F.3d at 1130. This June, the Supreme Court suggested the opposite, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Voisine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph SimmsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Monico DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Randly BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  5. United States v. Randly BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API