United States v. Joe Benally
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on August 1, 2016 is amended as follows:
Replace the portion of the opinion that runs from the second paragraph of page 9 of the slip opinion (beginning <Leocal explicitly leaves open the question whether ... >) through the end of the penultimate paragraph on page 10 (which ends < ... and is no longer good law.>) with:
<After Leocal, we held that “neither recklessness nor gross negligence is a sufficient mens rea to establish that a convi,ction is for a crime of violence under § 16.” Femandez-Ruiz, 466 F.3d at 1130. This June, the Supreme Court suggested the opposite, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Voisine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Joseph SimmsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Monico DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Randly BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Randly BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.