Legal Opinion
State v. Dziob
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 16, 1946PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.
The defendant was found guilty of incest with his thirteen-year-old daughter. He has appealed, assigning error in the finding and also in the trial court’s conclusion of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In his brief, he treats this as raising the question that the court could not properly reach that decision upon all the evidence. We shall so regard it, considering the finding only as showing, where there is conflicting evidence, the conclusion the court reached on it, and in relation to certain rulings on evidence as to which the defendant also assigns error. State v. Cots, 126 Conn. 48, 53,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. De WolfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830
- State v. SebastianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- State v. SegerbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- State v. ZimnarukSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- State v. CotsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. OuelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. BrigandiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. FoordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Lusby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.