Legal Opinion

Whitney Theatre Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 19, 1963PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcobn, J.

Hamden Mart, Inc., owns property at 2300 Dixwell Avenue in Hamden. The property is in a business CA-1 zone. The Hamden zoning regulations do not include an indoor theater among the permissible uses in such a zone. The property embraces about twenty-nine acres of land developed as a shopping center and occupied by twenty-three business establishments, including two department stores, a supermarket, a bank, a gasoline-repair station, a forty-lane bowling alley, a restaurant with a seating capacity for 600 persons and parking facilities for over 2000 automobiles. Hamden Mart, Inc., applied to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  3. Housing Authority v. PezenikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Fox v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Bright v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of Examiners in PodiatrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. United Cable Television Services Corp. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Gregorio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Mott's Realty Corporation v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API