Legal Opinion

Winton v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 12, 1939No. 14,542PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bock

This is an action by plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against, E. J. Sullivan, defendant in error, defendant below, on a promissory note. Judgment was entered in favor of defendant and plaintiff seeks reversal. The issues were decided upon the pleadings and stipulated facts. It appears that June 11, 1932, The Littleton Drug Company executed and delivered its promissory note to the First National Bank of Littleton, payee. Defendant, prior to delivery of said note to payee, endorsed the same as follows: “Demand notice and protest waived. Payment guaranteed. E. J. Sullivan.” Payee went into…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Voss v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Ruby v. West Coast Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Mangold & Glandt Bank v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Hall v. Farmers BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. First National Bank v. BaldwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foothills Holding Corp. v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API