Ralston Purina Co. v. Como Feed & Milling Co.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CLAYTON, Chief Judge.
On judgment heretofore obtained by Ralston Purina Company ,in this court against Como Feed & Milling Company, writs of garnishment were issued against many who plaintiff claims were indebted to Como on accounts receivable. As responsive pleadings came in, these garnishees, all of whom denied the claimed indebtedness, were classified for consideration of consolidation of those within each class for separate trials for each such class. The cases as to twenty-eight such garnishees, which were thought to be in the same posture as to pleadings and issues,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Stoneman v. Fox Film Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- White's Lumber & Supply Co. v. CollinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
- Burnett's Lumber & Supply Co. v. Commercial Credit Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- Allen Gravel Co. v. NixMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Affordable Care, LLC v. McIntyreDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022
- Antonetti v. FilsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Brett Wagers v. Robinson Nevada Mining Company, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Risinger v. SOC LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Sanchez v. Renown South Meadows Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.