Brett Wagers v. Robinson Nevada Mining Company, et al.

2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 BRETT WAGERS, 3:25-cv-00055-MMD-CLB 7 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 8 ROBINSON NEVADA 9 MINING COMPANY, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 I. SUMMARY 12 The Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion 13 to dismiss. (ECF No. 49 (“Order”).) Before the Court are two motions: Defendants’ motion 14 for clarification, or alternatively, to dismiss the remaining claim against the Individual 15 Defendants1 (ECF No. 55 (“Motion for Clarification”)2); and Plaintiff’s motion for 16 reconsideration (ECF No. 62 (“Motion for…