Legal Opinion
Cameron Et Ux. v. Bissonette Et Ux.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 5, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
The action is case to recover the value of a mare that belonged to the plaintiffs and was found dead in a brook while in the possession of the defendants. Trial was by jury. At the close of all the evidence the court directed a verdict for the defendants, to which the plaintiffs excepted.
It appeared, without dispute, that on October 3, 1928, the plaintiffs purchased from the defendants a farm on which the latter then resided and" certain live stock, including the mare in question; that the defendants were to have time (how long did not appear) in which to move off the farm, and were to have…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ide v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- Woodcock's Admr. v. HallockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Gilson v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1892
- Stevens v. DudleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
- Mayor & Council of Hagerstown v. FoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meyette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Beatty v. DunnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Repucci v. Lake Champagne Campground, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2002
- Hobart v. P. J.'s Auto Village, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.