Hendricks v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for burglary of a building. Upon finding that appellant had previously been convicted of murder with malice, the jury set punishment at life imprisonment. See Tex.Penal Code Ann., § 12.42(b).
Appellant submits nine grounds of error, none of which challenge the sufficiency of the evidence.
Initially, appellant complains that the trial court abused its discretion in denying him a continuance to secure an eyewitness for rebuttal purposes. However, the contemplated eyewitness, one Mr. Black-ford, apparently would not have rebutted anything:…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nicholas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Kerns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Norris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Reese v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
- Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Richardson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.