Legal Opinion

Reese v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided July 7, 1995No. 06-93-00146-CRPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Gerald Reese appeals from his conviction for aggravated possession of cocaine and for violation of the Controlled Substances Act. He contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s finding that enhanced his punishment, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, that the trial court erred by refusing to rule on motions to re-cuse and by denying a motion objecting to his assignment, and that multiple errors were made in connection with a Batson hearing. Reese also contends that the court erred by denying him an evidentiary hearing on his…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Beck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. McQueen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  2. Ex Parte Jessep, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  3. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  5. ALEXANDER, KELVIN GRANT Jr.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API