Legal Opinion

Looney v. Trimount Theatres, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1933PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of tort brought by the plaintiff as assignee for the benefit of creditors of The Candy Box Inc. seeking to recover damages for the conversion of certain items as set forth in a schedule annexed to the declaration. The case was heard in the Superior Court without a jury. The judge made the following findings and rulings: “The articles referred to in the plaintiff’s declaration are tenant’s fixtures placed on the premises many years ago by a tenant and left there by several successive tenants at the expiration of leases or tenancies without any effort to remove them. Title…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McLearn v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Boston & Albany Railroad v. ReardonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Searle v. Roman Catholic Bishop of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Watriss v. First National Bank of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Guthrie v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. PMZ Oil Co. v. LucroyMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Michael J. Colarusso Mary Colarusso, Debtors, Robert Canzano, Trustee of the J & B Realty Trust Joan Canzano, Trustee of the J & B Realty Trust v. Mary M. RagosaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  3. Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  4. Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Vincent v. PleckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API