Legal Opinion

Ross v. Cannon

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided September 12, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

125 A.2d 266 (1956)

Laura Mae ROSS, Plaintiff,

v.

Roy Allen CANNON and Mary C. Cannon, Defendants.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, Sussex.

September 12, 1956.

Arthur Dean Betts, Georgetown, for plaintiff.

Robert W. Tunnell, Georgetown, for defendants.

MARVEL, Vice Chancellor.

Plaintiff alleges that on or before June 25, 1946, she reached an oral agreement with the[1] defendant under the terms of which he agreed to sell her certain property in Seaford Hundred, Sussex County, lying on the west side of the road leading from Seaford to Bridgeville and more fully described in the complaint. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ardito v. HowellCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
  2. Shepherd v. NilesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
  3. Hallett v. ParkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896
  4. Ross v. CannonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Durand v. SnedekerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  2. Durand v. SnedekerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API