Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. Niles

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided August 2, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

There are two questions presented by this cause. These are, first, was a paroi contract entered into between the parties as alleged in the bill, and second, if so, was there such part performance of it as to take the case out of the statute of frauds?

The view I take of the second question makes it unnecessary for me to consider the first one. Conceding that the oral agreement was entered into as alleged in the bill, yet it seems clear to me that the complainant is not entitled to have it specifically enforced for the reason that the facts fail to disclose such part performance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thistle v. Frostburg Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
  2. Matthes v. WierCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1912
  3. Houston v. TownsendCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1833
  4. Frostburg Coal Co. v. ThistleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Quillen v. SayersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Durand v. SnedekerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  3. Shepherd v. MazzettiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Sussex Investment Co. v. ClendanielCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1925
  5. Durand v. SnedekerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API