Holmes v. David H. Bricker, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.
Plaintiffs brought this action in the municipal court to recover damages for injury to their automobile. The court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend on the ground that the action was barred by a judgment plaintiffs had obtained for personal injuries suffered in the same accident. Plaintiffs appeal from the ensuing judgment of dismissal.1
On August 24, 1962, plaintiffs purchased a used automobile from defendant. The contract of sale contained an express warranty that 11 The used car sold herein is hereby warranted to be in good operating condition and to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Bowman v. WohlkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Lamb v. HarbaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Retherford v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Shaffer v. DebbasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Cain v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Lortz v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.