Legal Opinion

Weggeman v. Seven-Up Bottling Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1958PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNgert, J.

1. Denial of judgment for plaintiff. Appellants’ first contention is that the trial court erred in refusing to grant their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. It is argued that since defendant offered no evidence, both the principle res ipsa loquitur and the testimony in the record entitled plaintiffs to recover, and that in such a case it would be contrary to public policy to permit the judgment for the defendant to stand.

By the court’s instructions, the jury were permitted to infer from the fact of the explosion that the bottle was dangerously defective in manufacture when…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Pillars v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Ryan v. Zweck-Wollenberg Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Nimits v. Motor Transport Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Koehler v. Thiensville State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lambrecht v. Estate of KaczmarczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. D.L. Ex Rel. Friederichs v. HuebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Magdalene M. Smoot and Ryan M. Smoot v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. And Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Powers v. Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Peplinski v. Fobe's Roofing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API