Powers v. Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
Hunt argues there is not sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict finding it liable for the injuries sustained by Powers. Hunt raises two other questions, i.e., the verdict is contrary to law or evidence and it was error not to grant its motion to dismiss and for a directed verdict. These latter two questions are premised upon the insufficiency of the evidence. Powers was employed as a cook at Curley’s Kestaurant and it was his duty to make noon lunches and to order food stuff necessary therefor. He regularly ordered food stuff from Dairy State Butter and Egg Company which included a case…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Schuh v. Fox River Tractor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Franklin v. Badger Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Holifield v. Setco Industries, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Jagmin v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Correia v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Norwilton Murray v. Fairbanks Morse, Beloit Power Systems, Inc., in No. 78-2224. Cross Appeal of Norwilton Murray, in No. 78-2225Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Teagle v. Fischer & Porter Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
- Pan-Alaska Fisheries, Inc. v. Marine Construction & Design Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.