Legal Opinion

Kuhn v. Ambrose

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1933No. 24188. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is a replevin action to recover possession of certain personal property sold under' conditional sales contract and subsequently acquired by a third party. The parties to this action are not those between whom the sales contract was originally made. From a judgment dismissing the action, tried before the court, the plaintiff has appealed.

On August 26, 1929, Carl D. Bush sold to J. M. Eager, under a conditional sales contract, a Fordson donkey and equipment for the sum of nine hundred dollars, of which one hundred and fifty dollars was paid in cash at the time and the balance of seven…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. JaussaudWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hess v. StarwichWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tope v. BrattainWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Snow v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API