Legal Opinion

Hess v. Starwich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1928No. 21452. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

On March 16,1925, one Priebe filed suit in King county against W. Davis for the recovery of $420 claimed to be due for merchandise. At that time a writ of attachment was issued out of the superior court to the sheriff o'f King county, who attached, on April 8, an auto trailer then in Davis’ possession, and being used by him. This trailer had been sold to Davis under a conditional sale contract in 1923, and at the time of the attachment he was behind in'his payments. He wrote to the Hess Motor Company at Bellingham, who owned the conditional sale contract, advising them that the sheriff had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lee Tung v. BurkhartOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. JaussaudWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Browder v. PhinneyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Clark v. GrogerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Western Bond & Mortgage Co. v. ChesterWashington Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schlieff v. BistlineIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Eckley v. Bonded Adjustment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Martin v. SikesWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Muscatel v. StoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. E. L. Jones & Co. v. UnruhSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API