Legal Opinion
Brodie v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 12, 2011No. Civil Action 10-544 (JEB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
In January 2010, Defendant United States Department of Health and Human Services determined that Plaintiff Scott Brodie had committed research misconduct. For his actions, HHS barred him from participating in projects funded by the federal government for seven years. Plaintiff then filed this suit challenging his debarment under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., and the United States Constitution. He claims that the Administrative Law Judge erred in determining both that he had acted improperly and that a seven-year…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bettor Racing, Inc. v. National Indian Gaming CommissionDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Brodie v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Brodie v. HarganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Doctors for America v. Office of Personnel ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Frech v. U.S. Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.