Legal Opinion

Brodie v. Hargan

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 27, 2017No. 16-5238Published

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

2Per curiam

This petition for review was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. R.34(j). The court has accorded the issues full consideration and determined they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 36(d).It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the appeal be dismissed because the appellant’s claims are “insubstantial, implausible, foreclosed by prior decisions of this Court, or otherwise completely devoid of merit.” CREW v. Office of Admin., 566 F.3d 219, 226…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Office of AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  3. Brodie v. Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Brodie v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API