Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. Estate of Lape
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 3, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJeffords, J.
This is an appeal from the probate court for the district of Fair Haven to the Rutland county court upon the disallowance of a claim presented by the plaintiff as a contingent claim under P. L. sec. 2940. The case was tried in county court without jury where judgment was rendered for the plaintiff as a contingent claim. To this judgment the defendant excepted and comes here on this exception.
It is shown by the facts found that on September 30, 1927, Rushmore Lape and' his wife Rosena gave a warranty deed to the plaintiff, their daughter, of certain premises located in Fair Haven. This deed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- South Milwaukee Co. v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Administrator of Sargent's Estate v. Administrator of Kimball's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
- Boyd v. BartlettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1863
- Richardson v. DorrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1833
- Kreichman v. Webster, Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Olcott v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1949
- Landreth v. First Nat. Bk. of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Town of Randolph v. KetchumSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
- Eric v. Tax Commissioner of ConnecticutConnecticut Superior Court · 1947