Legal Opinion

Olcott v. Southworth

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 5, 1949PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtles, J.

This cause was originally an action at law brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for the breach of a covenant against incumbrances contained in the deed of a farm executed and delivered to him by the defendants. On the defendants’ motion it was transferred to the Court of Chancery in order to enable them to present an equitable defense not available to them at law. They filed an answer in the nature of a cross bill praying for reformation of the deed on the ground that the incumbrance, which was a right to take water from a spring upon the premises and to make necessary repairs to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nelson v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  2. Bailey v. Agawam National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. City of New York v. New York & South Brooklyn Ferry & Steam Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. City of N.Y. v. . N.Y. S.B. Ferry S.T. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Richmond v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bianchi v. LorenzSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Lace v. University of Vermont & State Agricultural CollegeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  3. Hunter Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Adams v. SeymourSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  5. Sterling v. BlackwelderDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API