Legal Opinion
Town of Randolph v. Ketchum
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 6, 1953No. 828PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
This is an action to recover the penalty and damages specified in V. S. 47, § 7137 for the removal of Mark Lawrence from Stockbridge to Randolph. The declaration is in two counts, one for the penalty and the other for the damages. Trial was by court. Findings of fact were made and judgment entered thereon for the plaintiff. The case is here on exceptions of both defendants.
V. S. 47, § 7137, so far as material here, provides:
“A person who brings a poor person from any town in the state to another town in the state, or aids therein, with intent to charge such town with his support, shall…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Little v. LoudSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
- Holton Estate v. EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
- Schwarz v. AverySupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
- Nadeau v. MarchessaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
- Flint Et Ux. v. Davis Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- E. A. Strout Realty Agency, Inc. v. WoosterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
- Knight v. WilleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
- New England Road MacHinery Co. v. CalkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959
- Campbell v. Howard National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1954
- Bagalio v. HoarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.