Legal Opinion

Brown v. Peoples Security Ins.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 94-4544PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HUYETT, District Judge.

Upon consideration of Peoples Security Insurance Co.’s (“Defendant’s”) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Plaintiffs answer thereto, Defendant’s motion is DENIED.

Philip C. and Rosalie A. Brown (“Plaintiffs”) filed a pro se complaint that, construed liberally, appears to set forth claims based on breach of contract, negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, and loss of consortium.

When deciding a motion to dismiss a complaint,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Ransom v. MarrazzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Kursman (In Re Harry Levin, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Lundes Garrett v. GEICO Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API