Legal Opinion

State v. Weatherby

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 24, 1943No. 38178PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTipton, J.

— This is the second appeal in this case. The opinion in the first appeal is reported in 129 S. W. (2d) 887, 344 Mo. 848. In that appeal, we held it was unlawful for the respondent to be paid out of appropriations to the Legal Department for services rendered by respondent as special attorney for the Insurance Department; but we held that respondent did have a right of recoupment if he could show a sufficient unexpended portion of the appropriation to the Insurance Department was transferred to the general revenue of the State, and he could have been legally paid for his services and expenses…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WeatherbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. SpeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. Meyer v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. State Ex Inf. Huffman v. Show-Me Power Co-Op.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  3. Lotz v. Missouri Distributing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. United States v. GerdelDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1952
  5. Patton v. PattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API