Legal Opinion

State Ex Inf. Huffman v. Show-Me Power Co-Op.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 14, 1946No. 38883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeedy, J.

This is an original proceeding by information in the nature of quo warranto, instituted by the Prosecuting Attorney of Wright County, in his official capacity, and at the relation of two resident taxpayers of that county, against respondent, Sho-Mé Power Cooperative, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as Sho-Me), wherein certain public utility companies have been-permitted to become intervenors.

Hon. Arthur N. Adams, Jr., of the Kansas City Bar, who was appointed Special Commissioner to hear the evidence and report .his •findings of fact and conclusions of law, filed an exhaustive report…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Helvering v. Morgan's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Maben v. RosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Montello Salt Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Nordberg v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Automobile Club of Missouri v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Lowry v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Short v. Southern Union Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State Ex Rel. Howard Electric Cooperative v. RineySupreme Court of Missouri · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API