Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 7, 1943No. Nos. 38151, 38152PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTipton, J.

The respondent, as trustee, filed this action on behalf of numerous employees of the appellant to recover the difference between the salary received by each employee and the amount that he claimed they should have received under an ordinance fixing the salaries of’’its various employees from January 1, 1929, to May 1, 1939. The trial court found that 105 of the assignors were not entitled to recover, denied a recovery for any salaries beyond five years prior to the filing of this action, and allowed a recovery for non-ordinance salary reductions within the five-year period of the Statute of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. LangstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. State Ex Rel. McGaughey v. GraystonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Rothrum v. DarbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. State v. WeatherbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. State ex rel. Evans v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Burger v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Minor v. LillardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance v. National Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  4. Coleman v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  5. City of San Antonio v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API