Legal Opinion

Smith v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 8, 1955No. 12906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANNON, Justice.

The nature of the case before us is plain from the opening sentence of appellant’s brief: “This is an appeal from an interlocutory order overruling the Motion of W. F. Smith, Defendant, hereinafter called Appellant, to quash the writ of garnishment filed in this cause by Buck C. Miller and E. R. Parker as Plaintiffs and Garnishers hereinafter referred to as Ap-pellees against City National Bank of Houston, as Garnishee.” We have no jurisdiction of an appeal from an interlocutory order overruling a motion to quash the writ in a garnishment suit. Such an order, as stated by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. TallalTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Archer v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Rogers v. East Line Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Proctor v. Associates Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kessler v. Kessler, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  2. Smith v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. Thibodeaux v. H. B. Zachry Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Shiflett v. Associated Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API