Legal Opinion

Boldt v. Motor Securities Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 2, 1923No. 10,673PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appeared in reverse order below and are hereinafter referred to as there.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover on two promissory notes, of $800.00 each, given it by defendant, as it says, for ten shares of its capital stock. At the close of all the evidence each party moved for judgment, whereupon the trial court discharged the jury and gave judgment for plaintiff, to review which this writ is prosecuted by defendant, and he ,now asks that it be made a supersedeas.

One of the defenses was that these notes represented a mere loan of credit to plaintiff, were to be returned…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lofland v. CahallSupreme Court of Delaware · 1922
  2. Washer v. SmyerTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Meholin v. CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Alabama National Bank v. HalseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Denver Fire Insurance v. McClellandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Parker v. PlymptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  2. Joy v. GodchauxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  3. Lewis v. WinslowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Haselbush v. Alsco of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  5. Bell, SEC. of Banking v. AubelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API