James v. James

Opinion per curiam.

Heretofore,’ on application of plaintiffs in error, and for good cause shown, we ordered that service of the writ of scire facias issued herein might he made by publication as our rule 20 contemplates. Such publication it seems was made. Defendant in error “appearing specially for the purpose of this motion only, and for no other purpose,” asks that the writ itself be quashed and that the attempted service of the same by publication be set aside. This motion is misconceived. Every appearance by a party to a suit through his counsel is presumed to be a general…