Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 5, 2020No. 3:17-cv-01561Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PATRICIA HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:17-cv-01561 (JAM) HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO., Defendant. ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS Plaintiff Patricia Hughes moves for an award of attorney’s fees and costs. For the reasons explained below, I will grant Hughes’s motion in part and will award $105,762.25 in attorney’s fees and $3,576.54 in costs. BACKGROUND Hughes brought this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”),

29 U.S.C. § 1001

et seq., against defendant Hartford Life and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Restivo v. HessemannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  3. Arthur Chambless and Mildred H. Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. Stanczyk v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  5. Donachie v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API