Legal Opinion

In re Woebbeking

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided September 18, 2017No. CASE NO. 09-10034Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ON MOTION TO RESTRICT ACCESS

Robert E. Grant, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court

At Fort Wayne, Indiana, on September 18, 2017.

The purpose of any request for relief, be it a complaint, a motion, or an application, is to clearly and concisely inform the reader what it is the filer wants and why they should get it. In the case of a complaint, that means “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief’ and “a demand for the relief sought,” Fed. R. Civ. P. Rules 8(a)(2), (3); while' a motion or application is to set forth the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. United States of America by and Through Joseph E. Garst v. Lockheed-Martin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Delaware Riverkeeper Network v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  4. Zinovy v. Reytblatt v. Harold B. DentonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. In Re WhiteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API